To which I responded here -
You didn’t want to respond to that and went off with your “amusing type of Bitcoiners” post.
For a self-styled Alan Watts account - that’s an incredibly narrow-minded point of view.
Bitcoin winning and becoming the dominant money =/= status quo nation states and corporations adopting it.
Why do we want status quo nation states adopting our money and economy?
Why shouldn’t we be aiming to replace status quo nation states and their permissioned “body corporates” entirely along political and ideological lines which suit us?
Why would we want status quo politicians to be in charge, with our money?
Why shouldn’t we be in charge?
You’re accepting rulers so don’t give me the ancap “rules without rulers” line - if you want rulers, why not have Bitcoiners in charge?
Why the mob who got us into the shitshow in the first place? Why would you trust them to do anything other than fuck it up and not be seeking a paradigm shift from people who might avoid the pitfalls they entered?
Bitcoin winning and becoming the dominant money =/= status quo nation states and corporations adopting it.
Why do we want status quo nation states adopting our money and economy?
Why shouldn’t we be aiming to replace status quo nation states and their permissioned “body corporates” entirely along political and ideological lines which suit us?
Why would we want status quo politicians to be in charge, with our money?
Why shouldn’t we be in charge?
You’re accepting rulers so don’t give me the ancap “rules without rulers” line - if you want rulers, why not have Bitcoiners in charge?
Why the mob who got us into the shitshow in the first place? Why would you trust them to do anything other than fuck it up and not be seeking a paradigm shift from people who might avoid the pitfalls they entered?
You didn’t want to respond to that and went off with your “amusing type of Bitcoiners” post.
Bitcoin winning absolutely entails nation state adoption. Believing otherwise is pure delusion.
Hide replies
Nation state continuance under the status quo is the kind of fallacy someone who self styles under “Alan Watts” really ought not be using as justification for their worldview.
Like that is way out of line with what you’re supposed to be portraying. I’m no Watts expert, but I do know that.
So if you’d like to make the claim that nation state adoption is core to Bitcoin’s enduring success “ALAN WATTS”, you should engage the argument I proposed that nation states ought not continue under the Status Quo and Bitcoiners ought be replacing them and be in charge of those systems which for some bizarre reason you just don’t want to touch.
Like that is way out of line with what you’re supposed to be portraying. I’m no Watts expert, but I do know that.
So if you’d like to make the claim that nation state adoption is core to Bitcoin’s enduring success “ALAN WATTS”, you should engage the argument I proposed that nation states ought not continue under the Status Quo and Bitcoiners ought be replacing them and be in charge of those systems which for some bizarre reason you just don’t want to touch.
