to charge the elect representative for the campaign promises he made and to express discontentment with the current system and its processes can look very similar of the cause is just.
I see that.
However the actions speak louder.
If one wants to see Ross free, one shouldn’t perpetuate institutions that robbed him of his freedom in the first place.
agreed. but how to distinguish between them? who's to say the people shouting for Ross's freedom are not also acting towards undermining those institutions as we know them? meanwhile, it doesn't do Ross any harm to have his plight made public, to get support from the community and putting the current administration under scrutiny.

point stands. If the cause is just, expressing your support for it and charging the institution doesn't look too different.
Let’s agree to agree. I wanted to see Ross free too.
Log In
App Logo
Feeds
Relays
Notifications
Messages
Groups
Settings
0
0
0