Denis Warburton
npub1gw6zu5t0csg4z6aj58urm7h9q529ehnav3zp3nplq8j6fhcj6lzsuhfu48
From post to production, infinity and beyond.
--
Video archaeologist for histories of Closed Captioning.
On-Set Digital Imaging Technician.
Owner of Art & Technic LLC.
--
ars sine scientia nihil est

formerly known as
@orangecomma / @artandtechnic
on the bird site
On a related RS/Tandy note, in 2020 I discovered - to my “surprise” - that the USB/RS-232 adapter cable that I’d originally purchased at Radio Shack circa 2010-2013, was actually one with a counterfeit Prolific chip in it.

Which Prolific’s Mac drivers detected, and therefore refused to work with it.

*Thankfully* I had another dongle with me at the time, so I could do what I needed to, but… that Radio Shack USB/RS232 cable has since been relegated to G4-Mini-Only status as a result.
I put surprise in quotes, because here in 2025, it makes a lot of sense that Radio Shack would have acquired those adapters from the absolute rock bottom cheapest supplier.

(Mind you, the whole serial adapter business is so riddled with Prolific counterfeits, that I basically only buy those with FTDI chips.)
I grew up to be an adult who doesn’t have trouble saying ‘no’ when asked for e-mail addresses and phone numbers by retail employees, because I grew up shopping at Radio Shack.
(

For those who did not have a Radio Shack / Tandy youth:

Phone number and/or address were the questions you were always asked at checkout.

Followed up by batteries.

And then later cellular phones.

You learned to say no so that you could GTFO in two minutes instead of 20. 😂

)
#acarsdrama 2025-04-16@04:05:24Z: N708FR (to ground)

COPY THANK YOU YOUVE BEEN AWESOME tonight.thanks FOR EVERYTHING
Eight of eight. Wow. 🤦‍♂️

Okay, I guess I’ll just show *still frames* of this first instead???
LOL, you can’t even use the video without the audio for _anything_ found on that tape. Incredible… and disappointing… but not entirely outside the realm of understanding.

That’s the copyright owner’s choice, and we’ll respect that. We’ll just have to do the still frames instead. (Which, incredibly enough, isn’t exactly a huge loss in respect to this “first.”)
LOL, you can’t even use the video without the audio for anything from that one tape. Incredible… and disappointing… but not entirely outside the realm of understanding.

I suppose we’ll just have to go with the still frames after all.

Which, incredibly enough, isn’t exactly a huge loss in respect to this “first.”
Seven of eight…. 💩
Eight of eight. Wow. 🤦‍♂️

Okay, I guess I’ll just show *still frames* of this first instead???
Six…. 🤷‍♂️
Seven of eight…. 💩
Six…. 🤷‍♂️
Five….. 😳
Three for three lol… I’ve a few more though….
Four…. 😅
Jeeez. Second possible clip also banned from the ranch….
Three for three lol… I’ve a few more though….
Turns out that the first video… is banned from the ranch so I’ll have to use something other than the actual first as a demonstration of the first.

Such is life.
Jeeez. Second possible clip also banned from the ranch….
Running another ‘Firsts’ videos through the, ahem, “copyright checking gauntlet.”
Running some other ‘Firsts’ videos through the, ahem, “copyright checking gauntlet.”
Log In
App Logo
Feeds
Relays
Notifications
Messages
Groups
Settings
0
0
0